"In her testimony, Miller acknowledged her own stories suggesting Iraq had weapons of mass destruction were flawed by sources with wrong information. But Miller argued that "even flawed reporters should not be jailed for protecting even flawed sources." (BREITBART.COM)
Fancy that. Miller may have gotten something wrong. There is even an intimation !gasp! that sources may have provided her with wrong information. What is this going to do to the credibility of the New York Times and their gullible knee jerk core readership who believe everything the New York Times publishes as gospel?