Why Are We The Only Nation That Purposely Avoids Energy Self-sufficiency?
Running on Empty: Toward a New Energy Policy - Statistical Data Included
American Enterprise, April, 2001 by Diana Furchtgott-Roth
With higher gasoline, home heating oil, and utility prices, the prospect of natural gas shortages on the horizon, and rolling electrical brownouts in California, the election of President George W. Bush, former oil driller, and Vice President Dick Cheney, former CEO of an energy company supplier, comes at a fortuitous moment. It says something about our country's priorities, however, that these two men's experience in the energy industry was more frequently derided than praised during the presidential campaign.
For although Americans are the world's biggest consumers of energy, we are the only nation that purposely avoids self-sufficiency in energy. Much of the public looks down on energy production as a dirty business best kept out of sight. We're ashamed of our magnificent drilling rigs and refineries, and think of coal and nuclear energy as darkly dangerous. Reflecting this public taste, the federal government has raised numerous roadblocks to the development of our energy resources--with the result that we are now perilously vulnerable to energy shortages.
Big Bubba Observation: Five years later and very little has changed. No new refineries, substantial areas off shore off limits, no new Alaskan oil drilling, no new nuclear power plants, and many many more onerous restrictions on energy production. Are we crazy? Did the oilmen, Bush and Cheney, fail us, or is it rather a failure of our national intellect to understand that our economy runs on oil, not magic?
American Enterprise, April, 2001 by Diana Furchtgott-Roth
With higher gasoline, home heating oil, and utility prices, the prospect of natural gas shortages on the horizon, and rolling electrical brownouts in California, the election of President George W. Bush, former oil driller, and Vice President Dick Cheney, former CEO of an energy company supplier, comes at a fortuitous moment. It says something about our country's priorities, however, that these two men's experience in the energy industry was more frequently derided than praised during the presidential campaign.
For although Americans are the world's biggest consumers of energy, we are the only nation that purposely avoids self-sufficiency in energy. Much of the public looks down on energy production as a dirty business best kept out of sight. We're ashamed of our magnificent drilling rigs and refineries, and think of coal and nuclear energy as darkly dangerous. Reflecting this public taste, the federal government has raised numerous roadblocks to the development of our energy resources--with the result that we are now perilously vulnerable to energy shortages.
Big Bubba Observation: Five years later and very little has changed. No new refineries, substantial areas off shore off limits, no new Alaskan oil drilling, no new nuclear power plants, and many many more onerous restrictions on energy production. Are we crazy? Did the oilmen, Bush and Cheney, fail us, or is it rather a failure of our national intellect to understand that our economy runs on oil, not magic?
11 Comments:
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Solar power is about the only energy source that the environmental lobby will permit. But frankly, if given their choice, they'd probably elect to turn off the "fusion" switch. Just look at the way it contaminates our solar system, and causes all those genetic mutations. And skin cancer... don't even get me started. Do you know that flying in an airplane during a solar flare can give you the equivalent of 100 chest x-rays? And the astronauts don't wear lead jockstraps for nothin'!
-FJ
The post by #MLM# has been removed because of my basic objection to blog spamming on the cretins who inflict it on us the unwary. Go away and stay away.
Plenty of blame to go around, and yes, some of it falls on the failure of Bush and Cheney to lead. I hardly think Joe Couch Potato's opinion on the "dirty business" of energy production makes that big a difference (though as a consumer, his opinion matters--more in a minute). More obviously, it is the interests of the industries surrounding energy production that keep things from moving forward. This is not good, but it is understandable--there's a catch-22 involved.
I don't know whether these industries are financially or politically risk-averse. I don't know whether they're sinister cabals gouging us for their Christmas bonus. I imagine they want to drive the old car until they run it into the ground before they buy another.
I do know we have many technologies available that can alleviate some of the need for fossil fuels. But now we have to explain to Joe Couch Potato Consumer and his contractors that using (e.g.) geothermal energy and installing solar cells are to his advantage. We have to explain why taking vacations by train could be fun for the family, and actually less stressful than packing them in the Suburban.
But until we do that I don't think we'll see investment in a competetive rail system that makes sense, or in using renewable technologies in home construction.
norm,
You don't think "environmental correctness" has anything to do with it? It's all "producers" and "leaders" that is the problem?
I once read where the oil refining capacity in the United States was close to 200%. Then they closed down all those "old" facilities, and brought it down to just a "couple of percentage points" over 100%. The came the hurricane, and now we're screwed.
Do you think that "capitalists" like taking "capacity" off-line so that they can collude and run afoul of anti-trust laws? Did you see any environmental groups that didn't celebrate every victory that closed down some "polluter"... that didn't take every opportunity to rub Exxon executives faces in the mud over the Valdez disaster? That didn't start making claims of "environmental racism" every time someone wanted to open a new refinery or smelly factory in their neighborhood?
norm, the problem is not THEM. It's US. NIMBY's are what we are. NIMBY's we will always be. Just look at all that oil sitting off the coast of LA that is NOT getting pumped today. Why? Santa Barbara oil spill... or something "else".
-FJ
ps - When does the ANWAR oil start flowing. It should have already been here. But no, some caribou in Alaska might step in an oil puddle. Ever been to the La Brea (sic?) tar pits?
-FJ
This news from San Antonio should make Mr. Ducky a happy duck. I spent $2.65 a gallon for gas yesterday at a Valero station. San Antonio, and Valero, appreciate your business, Mr. Ducky.
Oil refinery boss enjoys very good week – hits $140M gusher
mr. ducky,
You may not realize this, but that energy bill they just passed WAS our "energy policy". Now, I know you don't like anything that passes, even when all your guys vote for it, but America doesn't have to wait for mr. ducky to approve. We don't need a study right now. I paid $3.05 this morning for "Regular".
And as for...bio-diesel, fuel efficient cars, mass transit, pebble fuel nuclear reactors and invest in Glasgow based Scottish Power...they are quite serious about wind power and doing things.
I'm all for "bio-diesel" but aren't children starving in Africa?
And I love fuel efficient cars. Especially the ones that take 10 times the energy to produce than ever get used over the cars lifetime.
And mass transit is nice for the cities, but how am I gonna get from my farm into town? You gonna build a train track for me next to my house?
And pebble fuel nuclear reactors are GREAT. I'm a big nuclear energy proponent. How long do the pebbles stay "brilliant"? Is it anything like pulverized coal?
And I'd loved to invest in Scottish Power, but I can't stand to see grown men running around my land in kilts. It's the hairy legs. They are soooo offensive.
And finally, wind power. Yes, we need more wind turbines. You should see the ones about fifty miles north of Fort Dodge. About half of them stay idle 24/7. Damn ducks keep running into them!
-FJ
But transportation IS efficient IN the city. All the tolls I pay ensure that. I can't help it if nobody rides. It's too demeaning.
-FJ
Transportation will never be efficient in the city as long as its citizens are not concentrated at much higher densities per square mile than the current norm. That is the reality plain and simple.
Excellent point BB.
-FJ
Post a Comment
<< Home